Wonder Weeks and Growth Spurts: What Neuroscience and Pediatrics Reveal About Your Baby’s Fussy Phases

Every new parent knows the scenario: just when you think you have your infant’s routine figured out, they suddenly become extra fussy, clingy, or wakeful for no obvious reason. These bewildering phases often leave parents asking, “Is something wrong, or is this just a phase?” In parenting folklore, two popular explanations often emerge: the so-called “Wonder Weeks” (developmental leaps in mental abilities; originally titled Oei, ik groei! in Dutch) and classic growth spurts (rapid bursts of physical growth). The Wonder Weeks concept, originating from a 1992 study and book by developmental psychologist Hetty van de Rijt and her husband, Dutch behavioral biologist Frans Plooij, suggests that babies go through predictable mental development “leaps” at certain ages, which temporarily make them crankier but ultimately lead to new skills. On the other hand, pediatricians have long observed that infants undergo physical growth spurts (gaining weight and length) during which they feed voraciously and often disrupt their sleep patterns. This article will demystify these phenomena by examining what science, from developmental neuroscience to pediatric research, says about Wonder Weeks and growth spurts, and how understanding them can offer practical insights for coping with your baby’s tough times.

What Are “Wonder Weeks”?

The term Wonder Weeks refers to a theory that infants experience 10 major leaps in cognitive development during the first 20 months of life, with about 8 leaps in the first year.

According to van de Rijt and Plooij, these leaps occur at roughly predictable ages (starting around 5 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and so on up to around 75 weeks) and are often heralded by a period of increased fussiness, clinginess, and crying (sometimes called “stormy” periods) (van de Rijt & Plooji, 1992)*. After the storm passes, the baby supposedly emerges with new mental abilities – a “sunny” phase where they practice new skills and appear happier. For example, a 5-week-old’s first leap is said to bring more awareness of sensations, while a later leap around 26 weeks might coincide with understanding relationships (distance, cause-and-effect), leading to milestones like crawling or stranger anxiety.

*For a quick overview, parents can read the summarized version of The Wonder Weeks available from SoBrief at: https://sobrief.com/books/the-wonder-weeks.pdf.

Origins and Scientific Roots

Is there science behind these leaps? The Wonder Weeks theory is grounded in ethological research conducted with chimpanzees in Tanzania alongside Jane Goodall, where the couple observed cyclical regression behaviors, such as increased clinging and crying, in infant primates. These findings, supported by earlier work by Robert Horwich (1974), inspired their hypothesis that similar, age-linked regression periods also occur in human infants. The couple then conducted longitudinal observational studies of mother-infant interactions in home settings, after which they reported synchronized fussy periods under controlled conditions (The Wonder Weeks, 2024).

Neuroscientific Insights

Intriguingly, some neuroscience research does align with the idea that babies’ development isn’t completely linear. Trevarthen and Aitken (2003) invite us to rethink what are commonly called “regression periods” in infancy, not as setbacks, but as Periods of Rapid Change (PRCs). While “regression” typically refers to a temporary return to earlier behaviors, like increased clinginess or disrupted sleep. These shifts are actually signs that the infant’s brain and motivation system are reorganizing to support new growth. Central to this process is the Intrinsic Motive Formation (IMF), a built-in neurobiological system that enables babies to express emotions, direct attention, and connect socially through actions like smiling, cooing, and imitating. Development doesn’t unfold in a straight line; instead, it comes in bursts of biological waves such as synaptogenesis and myelination that align with shifts in how infants feel, act, and learn.

Neuroscientists like Kolb and Gibb (2011) further confirm that these changes are both time-sensitive and experience-dependent: enriched environments can cause transient or lasting changes in brain structure, depending on timing, duration, and prior exposures. For instance, while cortical thinning or thickening during infancy tracks closely with behavioral development, early stress (prenatal stress) or sensory deprivation can alter dendritic growth in ways that persist, blunting the effects. Critically, these changes vary across developmental stages and even by sex, with juvenile and adult brains responding differently to the same stimuli. Cortical thickness fluctuates too, with thickening in language-related areas like Broca’s region and thinning in others, correlating with emergent skills.

Other factors, such as the microbiome (presence or absence of gut bacteria), nutrition (perinatal supplementation with nutrients like choline and certain vitamin-mineral blends), and parental behaviors (like maternal grooming), further shape brain architecture through epigenetic and neurotransmitter pathways, possibly explaining links between developmental infections and disorders like autism, modulateing brain plasticity as well as reversing structural effects of prenatal stress, and programming long-term stress responsiveness and hippocampal development, respectively (Kolb & Gibb, 2011).

Most importantly, PRCs represent critical windows in which caregivers play a key scaffolding role, as the infant shifts from reflexive to intentional behavior and from simple one-on-one interactions to richer, triadic social awareness (Kolb & Gibb, 2011). In this view, a baby’s “difficult week” may actually be a crucial neurodevelopmental “remodeling phase,” in which the brain reorganizes itself to support more complex emotional regulation, intentional action, and social learning. Far from being setbacks, these are periods of heightened sensitivity when the right experiences can leave lasting imprints on the growing brain (Trevarthen & Aitken, 2003; Kolb & Gibb, 2011).

Scientific Debate

That said, it’s critical to note that the Wonder Weeks framework has its skeptics in the scientific community. Critics point out that much of the evidence for the 10 leaps comes from the original researchers’ work and parents' anecdotes, rather than repeated, large-scale studies. In fact, attempts to replicate the Wonder Weeks findings have not been very successful. For example, Frans Plooij’s own Ph.D. student, Dr. Carolina de Weerth, tried to reproduce the leaps in a new sample – even measuring babies’ stress hormones – and found no clear evidence of the supposed fussy periods or developmental jumps. This led to considerable controversy: Plooij criticized her study and allegedly attempted to prevent its publication, and the disagreement eventually contributed to him leaving his university position.

Nevertheless, shortly after Frans Plooij and Hetty van de Rijt published their original observations on infant mental “leaps,” three independent replication studies followed in Sweden, Spain, and Great Britain, all reportedly confirming the core findings of recurring fussy periods linked to developmental shifts. In 2003, these studies were compiled alongside other supportive research in a dedicated volume, further amplifying interest in the theory. Plooij later co-authored the now internationally renowned parenting guide The Wonder Weeks (Oei, ik groei!), which has been translated into over 20 languages and embraced by countless parents worldwide. However, while the model resonates with many caregivers, developmental scientists have raised concerns about the rigidity of its predicted timelines.

While the Wonder Weeks model proposes distinct mental “leaps” at fixed times, many developmental psychologists emphasize that infant development unfolds along fluid, nonlinear trajectories. In their influential paper Development as a Dynamic System, Smith and Thelen (2003) argue that “development is seen as the emergent product of many decentralized and local interactions that occur in real time.” Rather than viewing variability as a nuisance, dynamic systems theory embraces it as a core feature of healthy development. As they explain, “real behavior in real children is… notably fragile and context dependent,” and what matters is not whether a child “has” a skill, but how behavior “stabilizes in its particular context over time.” Development is multicausal and self-organizing, meaning that no single factor (like age or stage) holds causal priority. Instead, behaviors like crawling or walking emerge as adaptive solutions to real-world problems, not as pre-programmed milestones, but as what they call “self-organizing” achievements.

A Balanced View

Again, science also emphasizes individual variability. The “average baby” may follow the textbook timeline, but real babies can and do diverge. The danger of over-relying on fixed schedules like Wonder Weeks is that parents might misinterpret what is normal for their particular child. If a baby doesn’t seem to have a fussy phase at 12 weeks, it doesn’t mean something is wrong (maybe that baby is just easy-going or will fuss at 14 weeks instead). Conversely, if a baby is extremely unsettled at an off-time, parents shouldn’t dismiss it just because “it’s not Wonder Week #X” – perhaps the baby has an ear infection or other issue. Developmental experts warn that strict stage models can lead to overlooking real problems or raising false alarms. Most researchers today view infant development as a dynamic, continuous process influenced by many factors (genetics, environment, caregiving, etc.), rather than a precise series of one-size-fits-all leaps.

The Wonder Weeks can be a helpful broad guide to typical baby behaviors – it reassures parents that fussiness can be part of normal growth – but it shouldn’t be treated as gospel or a diagnostic tool for your child. Every baby’s developmental trajectory is unique.

How about Growth Spurts and Feeding Demands?

Apart from cognitive leaps, babies also go through well-known physical growth spurts. During a growth spurt, an infant’s height and weight increase rapidly over a short period (hence the term “spurt”).

In the first year, there are several common growth spurt ages that many parents observe. According to pediatric growth data and breastfeeding research, these spurts often occur around 2-3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months of age (Davanzo & Baldassarre, 2024). During these times, you might notice your baby suddenly wants to feed nonstop, seems extra hungry or unsatisfied, and may wake up more at night to eat. In fact, it’s not unusual for an infant in a growth spurt to want to nurse or bottle-feed almost every 30 minutes to an hour during their peak fussy period! The baby is essentially “powering up” for a developmental jump in size, and in the case of breastfeeding, this cluster feeding signals the mother’s body to increase milk supply to meet the baby’s new caloric needs.

Hormonal Drivers and Infant Growth

Ever wonder what’s really fueling those rapid growth spurts in your baby? It’s not just all the milk, but they’re also riding a wave of powerful hormones. Two major players are growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) (Chennaoui et al., 2020). Expanding on this in the pediatric context, Bang, MD, PhD (2024) explains that from the very beginning of life, a baby’s growth is choreographed by a trio of powerful hormones, insulin, growth hormone (GH), and insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II), that work in synchrony to sculpt the body and fuel the brain. IGF-I, released from the liver in response to GH (which is produced in the brain's pituitary gland, especially during deep sleep) and modulated by insulin, drives the elongation of bones and development of organs (including the brain), while IGF-II is especially vital during fetal life, acting through specialized receptors to support tissue growth even before birth.

Interestingly, while GH becomes more dominant postnatally, its role in fetal growth is modest, with insulin and IGFs doing most of the heavy lifting early on. What makes this system even more fascinating is its adaptability – when nutrition is poor or insulin is lacking (as in type 1 diabetes), GH can still trigger metabolic processes like fat breakdown to maintain energy, but it loses its power to stimulate IGF-I and growth, a phenomenon known as GHR “uncoupling.” Yet the body is smart: even when circulating IGF-I is low, local production in tissues can quietly compensate, allowing children to grow seemingly normally while hidden hormonal imbalances brew beneath the surface. This complex hormonal dance not only determines how tall a child might grow but also shapes their lifelong risk for diseases like diabetes, showing just how profoundly early life signals can echo across a lifetime.

In the early months of life, a baby’s growth is mostly powered by good nutrition and plenty of rest, because IGF-1, the key growth hormone, naturally starts out low. In fact, endocrinologists note that measuring IGF-1 in a newborn isn’t useful because it’s low for the first 15-18 months by design (Ibba & Loche, 2022). But here’s where it gets interesting: in a study from Indonesia, Mexitalia et al. (2021) tracked 38 infants from birth to 6 months and found that IGF-1 levels didn’t rise, but they actually dropped. And the bigger the drop, the more babies gained in weight and head size. Surprising, right? This suggests that high IGF-1 at birth might reflect prenatal stress, and that a healthy decline after birth could set the stage for better growth. Meanwhile, a large study in Turkey by Yüksel et al. (2011) mapped IGF-1 and its partner protein IGFBP-3 in over 500 healthy kids under six. They found that while IGF-1 gradually increases with age, just like in the Indonesian study. Both teams also noticed that breastfeeding might play a role in keeping IGF-1 levels low, possibly due to hormones in breast milk that dial down the baby’s growth system. But around six months, things shift – IGF-1 starts rising, and growth spurts become more noticeable. So, it’s not just about having more IGF-1 but about when and how it changes that tells the real story of healthy development.

Mini-Puberty: The Hidden Hormonal Surge

Still wonder what’s quietly going on inside your baby’s body during those early months, even when all they seem to do is eat, sleep, and cry? Behind the scenes, another powerful hormonal orchestra is playing, and this phenomenon is called mini-puberty. From birth to about 6 months, your baby’s brain “wakes up” the reproductive hormone system, temporarily reactivating the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis that had been quieted during pregnancy (Lucaccioni et al., 2021). In boys, this surge causes testosterone levels to shoot up around 2 to 3 months, driving visible changes like testicular and penile growth, and even influencing future fertility by boosting Sertoli and germ cell development (Rohayem et al., 2024; Becker & Hesse, 2020). In girls, hormones like FSH and estradiol rise more gradually and can stay elevated up to age 2-4, subtly shaping early uterine and breast development, even if we don’t always see outward signs (Lucaccioni et al., 2021). If your baby was born early or small for their age, this hormonal burst might be even stronger and last longer, sometimes leading to more noticeable changes like breast swelling or rapid genital growth (Rohayem et al., 2024). But mini-puberty isn’t just about body parts; it may also leave fingerprints on early behaviors.

Some studies suggest that higher testosterone or estradiol levels during this time are linked to toy preferences, temperament, and early language development (Becker & Hesse, 2020). Still, this mini-puberty doesn’t cause visible behavioral fussiness as much as growth spurts do, because it’s more about maturing the reproductive system (e.g., baby boys may have a brief phase of increased testosterone to help develop testes and genitalia). However, it’s a fascinating reminder that an infant’s body is awash in many developmental hormones. While mini-puberty is separate from Wonder Weeks or growth spurts, it illustrates how dynamic infant physiology is. Your baby’s endocrine system is calibrating itself in early life – from growth hormones to metabolic hormones to stress hormones – all of which create a cascade of developmental changes.

These growth spurts typically last only a few days at a time. However, in that window, parents will often see not just increased feeding but also changes in sleep and mood. Babies may take longer naps right before a growth spurt (as if conserving energy) and then have more restless sleep during the spurt while calories are being diverted to growth. Research supports these observations: a longitudinal study published in SLEEP found that episodes of saltatory (sudden) length growth in infants were consistently preceded by increases in both total sleep time and number of naps, with a median odds ratio of 1.43 for each additional sleep bout (Lampl & Johnson, 2011). This suggests that sleep and growth are biologically synchronized, likely part of an integrated anabolic system.

Fussiness is a common companion to these spurts. While temporary irritability is often attributed to internal adjustments, emerging research suggests that early feeding patterns may also influence longer-term behavioral responses like food fussiness. For example, the Generation R Study, a large population-based cohort, found that introducing vegetables between 4 and 5 months of age was significantly associated with lower levels of fussy eating at 4 years old (de Barse et al., 2017). Interestingly, breastfeeding duration alone did not strongly predict later fussiness unless breastfeeding was very short (less than 2 months), which was associated with increased food fussiness. These findings imply that while fussiness during growth spurts is normal and transient, early exposure to a variety of flavors, especially through timely introduction of vegetables, may shape how children respond to new foods later in life. In other words, your baby isn’t hurting when they cry more during a spurt; they’re adjusting to both rapid internal changes and, potentially, how their early sensory and feeding experiences are wired into longer-term food behaviors.

Sleep, Fussiness, and Brain Development

Brain Growth in Early Infancy

Why do both Wonder Weeks' “leaps” and growth spurts often come with sleep disruptions and increased fussiness? The answer may lie in the developing brain. Infancy is an incredible period of neuroplasticity, meaning the brain is rapidly forming new connections and adapting to new experiences. Greater fetal and infant weight gain during the second and third trimesters, birth, and at 6, 12, and 24 months was independently associated with larger total brain volume at age 10 – for example, a one standard deviation increase in weight at birth corresponded to a 20.8 cm³ larger brain volume (95% CI: 16.4–25.1) (Silva et al., 2021).

In fact, longitudinal MRI data show that whole-brain volume increases by approximately 64% over the first three months of life. At birth, the brain is only about 33.5% of adult size, but by 90 days of age, it reaches nearly 55% of the adult brain volume – a dramatic growth powered by trillions of new neural connections forming in that short time (Holland et al., 2014). This rapid expansion is most intense immediately after birth. The average growth rate starts at about 1% per day and gradually tapers off to 0.4% per day by the end of the third month. This deceleration reflects a natural slowing of volumetric increase as developmental processes stabilize (Holland et al., 2014).

Neuroscientists have shown that the nervous system’s most intense development happens in early childhood, especially in infancy, when neurons are busy making synapses (connections) at a furious pace. This process is called synaptogenesis, and it “proceeds apace” in babies with sensory areas leading the way, synaptic overproduction peaks around 4 months in the visual cortex, 2 to 3 months in the auditory cortex, and from 7 to 12 months in language-related regions. This overconnectivity is later sculpted by synaptic pruning, a process that trims unused connections, explaining observed decreases in functional connectivity, particularly in the theta and alpha bands, from areas like the middle occipital cortex. Concurrently, myelination (the formation of fatty sheaths around nerve fibers to speed up signals) unfolds in a posterior-to-anterior sequence, beginning in subcortical structures and progressing toward the cortex. This trajectory accounts for the initially low, yet gradually increasing, connectivity in frontal regions as they become more functionally integrated over time (Bosch-Bayard et al., 2022).

Nutrition and Brain Wiring

Did you know that what babies drink in their first few months can shape how their brains grow for years to come? Breastmilk delivers a powerful blend of nutrients, like DHA, ARA, sphingomyelin, choline, and phosphatidylcholine, that serve as building blocks for the myelin sheath, which insulates brain cells and speeds up communication between them (Deoni et al., 2018, pp. 650–651). Children who were exclusively breastfed had significantly higher levels of myelination by age two across critical brain regions like the frontal, temporal, and occipital white matter, and parts of the corpus callosum, and this advantage didn’t fade with time; it persisted into later childhood (pp. 653–654). In contrast, formula-fed children lagged behind in both myelination and cognitive performance, even when socioeconomic factors were accounted for. But here’s where it gets really interesting: not all formulas are created equal. Those fortified with higher levels of DHA, ARA, choline, sphingomyelin, and folic acid led to better brain outcomes, while those with high iron but low LC-PUFAs fared worse (pp. 657–658). Sphingomyelin and phosphatidylcholine stood out as having the strongest and broadest links to healthy brain development, particularly in regions like the occipital and cerebellar white matter (p. 657). All of this illustrates a simple yet powerful truth, early nutrition isn’t only but also a blueprint for the developing brain.

Developmental Sleep Changes

All this brain development is wonderful in the long run, but in the short term, it can lead to temporary turmoil. Think of it as the brain’s “growth spurts.” When a baby’s brain is reorganizing – making sense of new cognitive skills or sensory inputs – they may have more trouble sleeping or seem more irritable. Why? One reason is sensory integration. As babies hit a new developmental stage, they often become aware of stimuli or concepts that they previously didn’t notice. For instance, many infants begin to experience separation anxiety (SA) as they develop object permanence – the cognitive ability to understand that people and things continue to exist even when out of sight, which, according to Piaget’s theory, typically emerges between 8 and 12 months (Wellman et al., 1986). This leap in understanding – a positive brain change – may suddenly make the baby anxious whenever mom or dad is not in view. In a study of 52 mother-infant pairs, researchers found that babies whose mothers had higher separation anxiety woke up more often at night and had less efficient sleep, even when the babies weren't especially fussy, suggesting that a mother’s emotional discomfort about being apart plays a bigger role in sleep disruptions than the baby’s own distress (Scher, 2008). No wonder they may cry more at night or cling desperately during the day around this age.

According to Battaglia (2015), separation anxiety (SA) isn’t just a modern childhood phase but an evolutionary inheritance deeply embedded in our biology. As mammals evolved, the emergence of new brain structures like the neopallium allowed for greater behavioral plasticity, but also came with a cost: prolonged dependency on caregivers due to the slower maturation of these complex brains. Human evolution pushed this even further – bipedalism narrowed the birth canal, so babies had to be born earlier and more neurologically immature, requiring even more caregiving. This trade-off between brain size and physical constraints made extended maternal care essential, laying the groundwork for SA as a protective, adaptive behavior. One of the earliest signs of this adaptation is the “separation call,” a vocal distress signal observed across mammals and driven by brain regions like the cingulate cortex, which in humans evolved into more nuanced emotional communication that strengthened caregiver bonds and gave rise to the family unit. While Separation Anxiety Disorder (SAD) represents an extreme and maladaptive form, it's important to remember that typical separation anxiety, peaking between 6 and 12 months and gradually declining by age 3, is a normal, healthy part of early development that reflects the growing bond between infant and caregiver and supports emotional security (Battaglia, 2015).

There’s also evidence from brain imaging that major neurological transitions align with fussy periods. EEG (electroencephalogram) studies show that infants’ brain wave patterns undergo shifts as connections multiply – their brain networks are literally wiring up. Kurth et al. (2013) show that as young children grow from toddlers to preschoolers, their brains become more connected during sleep. Using EEG recordings, the researchers found that different parts of the brain, especially those involved in language, movement, and sensory processing, communicate more strongly with age, and this growth happens in specific areas and frequency patterns. Interestingly, these brain connections don’t just improve over the years but rather change during a single night of sleep. Some connections between the two sides of the brain actually strengthen while the child sleeps, while connections within the same side may temporarily weaken, showing that sleep plays an active role in shaping the brain. This process may be linked to myelination, which is boosted by sleep-related brain activity like slow waves and spindles.

Later, in a study of 38 healthy newborns, Tokariev et al. (2016) found that a baby’s brain networks develop very quickly in the first two weeks after birth and behave differently depending on whether the baby is in active sleep (moving, dreaming) or quiet sleep (still, deep sleep); using safe brainwave recordings (EEG), they showed that the brain's ability to connect and synchronize different regions, measured by how well brain signals align in timing (PPC), strength (AAC), and coordination across different speeds (PAC), changes with age and sleep state: for example, deeper sleep showed stronger brain connections at very slow and very fast rhythms, while lighter, active sleep showed more connection in middle rhythms, and one type of brain coordination (PAC) was much stronger during deep sleep but decreased slightly as babies got older, suggesting that sleep plays a key role in wiring the newborn brain during this critical period of rapid development.

These internal changes might manifest outwardly as unsettled behavior. Think about how adults feel when undergoing big changes (like a growth spurt in adolescence or even just learning an intensive new skill) – we might be moody or have trouble sleeping, too. For babies, who can’t verbalize their experience, fussiness is a common outlet.

From early life in the womb, the human brain develops along two distinct memory pathways within the limbic system, each shaped by evolution and critical for how we later remember and relate to the world. One pathway, called the dorsal limbic system, is linked to the hippocampus and helps babies learn where things happen and in what context, like remembering a familiar place or routine. The other, the ventral limbic system, supports emotional and object-based memory, helping babies recognize faces, voices, or comforting toys. These two systems are powered by different parts of the lower brain: the lemnothalamic system (from the brainstem) activates during active sleep in the womb and boosts learning about space and context, while the collothalamic system (from the midbrain) operates during quiet sleep, helping the brain build connections for recognizing people and things. Importantly, these dual systems not only shape embryonic brain morphogenesis (early structure) but also play a key role in activity-dependent synaptogenesis (synapse formation) during fetal sleep, laying the groundwork for early neural circuitry (Luu & Tucker, 2023).

In early infancy, babies spend more time asleep than awake, with REM sleep occupying up to half, or more, of total sleep time. This stage of sleep plays a vital role in brain maturation, as it supports the growth of neural circuits through repetitive, spontaneous movements or “twitches” that provide proprioceptive/sensory feedback to the brain – a process especially pronounced in premature infants (Grigg-Damberger, 2017). During intense periods of synaptogenesis, when the brain is forming and refining thousands of new connections, infants may appear more sensitive to stimulation, more easily distracted, or show temporary changes in sleep patterns. These shifts may reflect the brain's heightened internal activity as it organizes and integrates new information.

Lastly, fussiness itself can be adaptive during leaps. The Wonder Weeks framework posits that when a baby is on the verge of a mental leap, they become clingy and cranky as a way of securing extra caregiver attention during a vulnerable time. From an evolutionary perspective, that makes sense: if a baby’s perception of the world is shifting (say, suddenly they can perceive depth or recognize strangers), staying closer to a caregiver provides safety until they adjust to this new ability. As Dr. Frans Plooij observed in chimpanzees and then human babies, a little extra crying and clinging could ensure the infant gets more protection and help while they figure out their new skills. Modern attachment theory echoes this: when babies go through developmental stress, responding with comfort and consistency helps them feel secure, which in turn actually helps their brain develop resilience. In short, those nights of endless rocking and shushing during a leap or growth spurt are not wasted – you are helping your baby’s rapidly changing brain by providing the calm presence it needs to organize itself.

Practical Tips for Parents

Whether or not you track Wonder Weeks on your smartphone, you’re bound to encounter times when your baby is especially fussy or suddenly growing out of everything. Here are some practical tips grounded in developmental science and pediatric advice to help you navigate growth spurts and developmental leaps:

Signs of a Leap or Growth Spurt:

• Increased Clinginess or Crying: Your baby may cry more easily and insist on being held all the time. They might be harder to soothe than usual (e.g. typical rocking isn’t working as well). This can happen during brain development leaps when they are seeking extra comfort and security.

• Changes in Sleep Patterns: You might notice sleep regressions – a baby who was sleeping longer stretches may start waking frequently at night or taking shorter naps. Alternatively, some babies take extra-long naps right before a growth spurt (like their body is stocking up on rest) and then have disrupted sleep during the spurt.

• Feeding Frenzy: A classic telltale of a growth spurt is increased appetite. Babies will cluster feed or take bigger bottles more often. It may feel like they are never satisfied – as one USDA infant nutrition guide notes, “many babies will nurse as often as every 30 minutes” during peak growth spurts. This is normal (exhausting, but normal!).

• New Skills or Interests: After a fussy phase, you may suddenly see your baby do something new – roll over, say a syllable, crawl, etc. During the stormy period, they were working up to this! For cognitive leaps, watch for budding abilities: maybe they now pay attention to tiny crumbs on the floor (improved vision), or show shyness with strangers (recognizing unfamiliar vs. familiar faces). These are signs that a developmental change has occurred.

How to Support Your Baby:

• Respond with Patience and Comfort: It sounds obvious, but responsive caregiving is one of the most effective tools during these phases. Studies show that babies actually learn and cope better when their cues are noticed and responded to promptly. So if your baby is extra fussy, try to meet the increased needs for snuggles or feedings rather than worrying you’ll “spoil” them. This responsiveness can ease their transition through the leap.

• Offer Extra Physical Contact: Skin-to-skin contact isn’t just for newborns – even older infants often calm down with some shirt-off cuddles or babywearing time. Placing the baby on your chest (or even taking a warm bath together, if appropriate) can activate calming hormones. Skin-to-skin has been shown to calm and relax both mother and baby, reducing stress hormones and even stabilizing the baby’s heart rate and breathing. When fussiness spikes, some cozy chest-to-chest time or gentle massage can reassure your little one.

• Keep Routines (but be Flexible): Maintaining a familiar sleep-time and feeding routine can give a sense of security when your baby is irritable. That said, be flexible to their needs – if they’re hungry ahead of schedule, feed them; if they’re rubbing eyes early, start the bedtime routine a bit sooner. Don’t worry about “bad habits” during a spurt; you can return to your normal schedule after the phase passes. The key is providing a predictable environment while accommodating the temporary changes.

• Encourage Safe Exploration and Play: If your baby is in a mental leap, they may be burning off energy by practicing new skills. Ensure they have safe opportunities to explore these skills during the day – for example, extra tummy time for a baby learning to crawl, or playing peek-a-boo to practice object permanence. This can satisfy their growing curiosity and maybe even reduce frustration (a busy baby is a happier baby!).

• Take Care of Yourself: A fussy baby or cluster-feeding marathon can take a lot out of parents. Remember to rest and refuel when you can. Stay hydrated (especially if you’re breastfeeding and your baby is nursing more). If possible, tag-team with your partner or a family member to get a break – even a 20-minute nap or a shower while someone else holds the baby can recharge you. Parental burnout will only make coping with a fussy phase harder, so your self-care directly benefits your baby, too.

• Watch for Red Flags: Most spurts and leaps are normal and manageable, but trust your instincts. If your baby’s crying seems painful (high-pitched, constant) or nothing you do soothes them at all, consider checking for other issues (illness, ear infection, reflux flare-up, etc.). Keep an eye on growth and nutrition – if the baby isn’t gaining weight or has fewer wet diapers, that’s a sign to call the pediatrician. Also, fever, vomiting, or diarrhea are not typical of a growth spurt or leap; those symptoms suggest sickness and merit a doctor’s attention. When in doubt, it’s better to consult a healthcare professional. Your pediatrician can distinguish normal developmental fussiness from other concerns and give you peace of mind.

Conclusion

Both Wonder Weeks and growth spurts speak to an essential truth: babies are growing and changing at an astonishing rate, and with growth comes some turbulence. As a parent, it’s both relieving and empowering to know that those days of inexplicable crankiness or all-night feeding frenzies are usually signs of healthy development. Your baby is literally wiring their brain and building their body in front of your eyes – of course, it’s hard work! The science of developmental leaps and spurts offers reassurance that “this too shall pass,” and often, a new skill or calmer period will follow.

However, it’s also a reminder to approach popular parenting theories with a scientifically literate mindset. The Wonder Weeks, while popular, is based on a hypothesis that isn’t fully backed by rigorous research. It doesn’t mean the idea is worthless – many parents find it very helpful as a rough guide – but it should be one source of insight among many. Always consider your individual child’s needs. No app or book (no matter how intriguing its claims) can replace the nuanced understanding you develop by observing and loving your own baby.

In bridging the gap between scientific findings and practical parenting, the best advice is to stay responsive and curious. Pay attention to your baby’s signals, and don’t be afraid to adjust your care based on what works for them. Use tools like growth charts, pediatric check-ups, and yes, even developmental calendars as frameworks – but not finite scorecards. Every infant will have their own wonder weeks and spurts that may not align perfectly with any schedule. By knowing the general science (e.g. babies often get fussy before a developmental milestone, growth hormones kick in around certain ages, etc.), you can feel more confident and less anxious when the next stormy phase hits. You can remind yourself: “Okay, this is hard, but it’s likely a normal phase. My baby is growing. What they need most is patience, comfort, and care.”

Through it all, remember that parenting an infant is an ever-evolving learning process for both baby and parent. The leaps and spurts will come and go. The sleepless nights will eventually be a memory, and you’ll marvel at how far your little one has come. By grounding your understanding in science and tempering it with your own loving intuition, you’ll navigate these wonder weeks and growth spurts with greater ease, armed with knowledge and empathy. Hang in there – both you and your baby are doing remarkable things, and each challenge today is building a brighter tomorrow in your child’s development.

Bibliography

Bang, P. (2024, April 4). Pediatric implications of normal insulin-GH-IGF axis physiology. In K. R. Feingold, S. F. Ahmed, B. Anawalt, et al. (Eds.), Endotext [Internet]. MDText.com, Inc. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK343487/

Battaglia M. (2015). Separation anxiety: at the neurobiological crossroads of adaptation and illness. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 17(3), 277–285. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2015.17.3/mbattaglia

Becker, M., & Hesse, V. (2020). Minipuberty: Why Does it Happen?. Hormone research in paediatrics, 93(2), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1159/000508329

Bosch-Bayard, J., Biscay, R. J., Fernandez, T., Otero, G. A., Ricardo-Garcell, J., Aubert-Vazquez, E., Evans, A. C., & Harmony, T. (2022). EEG effective connectivity during the first year of life mirrors brain synaptogenesis, myelination, and early right hemisphere predominance. NeuroImage, 252, 119035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119035

Chennaoui, M., Léger, D., & Gomez-Merino, D. (2020). Sleep and the GH/IGF-1 axis: Consequences and countermeasures of sleep loss/disorders. Sleep medicine reviews, 49, 101223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2019.101223

Davanzo, R., & Baldassarre, M. E. (2024). Infant Growth Spurts in the Context of Perceived Insufficient Milk Supply. Nutrients, 16(21), 3657. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16213657

de Barse, L. M., Jansen, P. W., Edelson-Fries, L. R., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Franco, O. H., Tiemeier, H., & Steenweg-de Graaff, J. (2017). Infant feeding and child fussy eating: The Generation R Study. Appetite, 114, 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.006

Deoni, S., Dean, D., 3rd, Joelson, S., O'Regan, J., & Schneider, N. (2018). Early nutrition influences developmental myelination and cognition in infants and young children. NeuroImage, 178, 649–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.056

Grigg-Damberger, M.M. (2017). Ontogeny of Sleep and Its Functions in Infancy, Childhood, and Adolescence. In: Nevšímalová, S., Bruni, O. (eds) Sleep Disorders in Children. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28640-2_1

Holland, D., Chang, L., Ernst, T. M., Curran, M., Buchthal, S. D., Alicata, D., Skranes, J., Johansen, H., Hernandez, A., Yamakawa, R., Kuperman, J. M., & Dale, A. M. (2014). Structural growth trajectories and rates of change in the first 3 months of infant brain development. JAMA neurology, 71(10), 1266–1274. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1638

Horwich, R.H. Regressive periods in primate behavioral development with reference to other mammals. Primates 15, 141–149 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01742277

Ibba, A., & Loche, S. (2022). Diagnosis of GH Deficiency Without GH Stimulation Tests. Frontiers in endocrinology, 13, 853290. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.853290

Kolb, B., & Gibb, R. (2011). Brain plasticity and behaviour in the developing brain. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, 20(4), 265–276.

Kurth, S., Achermann, P., Rusterholz, T., & Lebourgeois, M. K. (2013). Development of Brain EEG Connectivity across Early Childhood: Does Sleep Play a Role?. Brain sciences, 3(4), 1445–1460. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci3041445

Lampl, M., & Johnson, M. L. (2011). Infant growth in length follows prolonged sleep and increased naps. Sleep, 34(5), 641–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/34.5.641

Lucaccioni, L., Trevisani, V., Boncompagni, A., Marrozzini, L., Berardi, A., & Iughetti, L. (2021). Minipuberty: Looking Back to Understand Moving Forward. Frontiers in pediatrics, 8, 612235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.612235

Luu, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2023). Continuity and change in neural plasticity through embryonic morphogenesis, fetal activity-dependent synaptogenesis, and infant memory consolidation. Developmental psychobiology, 65(8), e22439. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.22439

Mexitalia, M., Pardede, B. K., Utari, A., & Mexitalia, M. (2021). Insulin-like growth factor-1 and growth in infants 0-6 months of age. Paediatrica Indonesiana, 61(2), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.14238/pi61.2.2021.89-93

Plooij, F. X. (1984). The behavioral development of free-living chimpanzee babies and infants. Monographs on Infancy, 207.

Rohayem, J., Alexander, E. C., Heger, S., Nordenström, A., & Howard, S. R. (2024). Mini-Puberty, Physiological and Disordered: Consequences, and Potential for Therapeutic Replacement. Endocrine reviews, 45(4), 460–492. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnae003

Scher A. (2008). Maternal separation anxiety as a regulator of infants' sleep. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 49(6), 618–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01872.x

Silva, C. C. V., El Marroun, H., Sammallahti, S., Vernooij, M. W., Muetzel, R. L., Santos, S., & Jaddoe, V. W. V. (2021). Patterns of Fetal and Infant Growth and Brain Morphology at Age 10 Years. JAMA network open, 4(12), e2138214. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38214

Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(8), 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00156-6

The Wonder Weeks. (2024, November 18). Scientific History The Wonder Weeks | The Wonder Weeks. https://thewonderweeks.com/about-us/history/

Tokariev, A., Videman, M., Palva, J. M., & Vanhatalo, S. (2016). Functional Brain Connectivity Develops Rapidly Around Term Age and Changes Between Vigilance States in the Human Newborn. Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 26(12), 4540–4550. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv219

Trevarthen, C., & Aitken, K. (2003). Regulation of brain development and age-related changes in infants' motives: The developmental function of regressive periods. In M. Heimann (Ed.), Regression periods in human infancy (pp. 107–184). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

van de Rijt, H., & Plooij, F. (1992). The Wonder Weeks: How to Stimulate Your Baby's Mental Development and Help Him Turn His 10 Predictable, Great, Fussy Phases Into Magical Leaps Forward. (Original work based on Ph.D. dissertation: Plooij, 1984)

Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., Bartsch, K., & Harris, P. L. (1986). Infant search and object permanence: A meta-analysis of the A-not-B error. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 51(3), i–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166103

Yüksel, B., Özbek, M. N., Mungan, N. Ö., Darendeliler, F., Budan, B., Bideci, A., Çetinkaya, E., Berberoğlu, M., Evliyaoğlu, O., Yeşilkaya, E., Arslanoğlu, İ., Darcan, Ş., Bundak, R., & Ercan, O. (2011). Serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels in healthy children between 0 and 6 years of age. Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology, 3(2), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.4274/jcrpe.v3i2.17

Assessed and Endorsed by the MedReport Medical Review Board