Sweet Deception: Unmasking Sugar and its Substitutes

I am sure most people can relate to the ‘crippling’ decision of purchasing either the refreshing classic Coca-Cola drink or the 'diet' or 'zero' alternative. Frequently, most people go with the latter choice due to the common misconception that sugar-free always means better for you. Well, the truth is, these lower-calorie, artificially sweetened alternatives may not have such sweet consequences for your gut health.

There's no doubt that at some point in your life, you have been warned of the dangers of eating too much sugar, whether it's from your parents as a kid, your doctors, or your friends. Excessive sugar consumption is associated with obesity, cardiovascular disease, as well as type II diabetes. So, there’s no surprise that in an increasingly health-conscious world, the market for sugar alternatives is growing.

The rise of sugar alternatives began in the 1950s. Following World War II, the price of sugar rose, as did the demand for reduced caloric sweeteners, and so the thriving industry of synthetic sugar substitutes boomed. Not long after, this was followed by the emergence of the low-calorie diet soft drinks industry, which saw the development of Kirsch's 'No-Cal Ginger Ale', Coca-Cola's 'Tab', and 'Diet Pepsi'.

There are different categories of sugar substitutes that are found in a variety of products. What they have in common is their high sweetening power combined with low caloric intake. Sugar alcohols derive from natural fermentation processes of fruit and vegetables. They are a common low-calorie sweetener and found frequently in lipsticks, lip balms, mouthwashes, toothpaste, as well as canned and baked goods.

Artificial sweeteners are another category, and differ from sugar alcohols in that they are commonly made in the lab. Examples include sucralose, aspartame, and saccharin, available in coffee shops everywhere as the pastel-coloured sachets of Splenda (sucralose-based), Equal (aspartame-based), and Sweet 'n low (saccharin-based). In addition, if you read the labels on your cans of Diet Coke or Coke Zero, you will even see some of these synthetic ingredients.

Artificial sweeteners have been useful as sugar replacements for people seeking to manage their weight or diabetes and helpful for companies trying to sell lower energy food and drink products with retained levels of sweetness. However, despite the vast infiltration of these substitutes into the market and the ubiquitous advertising of 'healthier' sugar-free options, it is important to shed light on the fact that synthetic sweeteners are not an entirely healthy replacement and can affect and change your body in different ways.  

The human body, while comprised of your DNA-containing cells, is also home to trillions of different micro-organisms. The gastrointestinal tract houses the greatest proportion of these microbes and is known as the gut microbiota. Each person has a unique composition of bacteria, viruses, yeasts, and archaea that have a crucial role in breaking down, absorbing and synthesising different vital nutrients, as well as regulating metabolic hormones.

Glucose is just one of these essential macronutrients. It forms the basis of other sugars, such as starch, maltose (malt), lactose (in milk), and sucrose, also known as white table sugar. When consumed, all these sugars are metabolised in the small intestine into glucose, which is the body's main source of energy. This energy is used to power your muscles, brain activity, and other important cellular processes.

Artificial sweeteners may replace sugar in taste, but they cannot supersede its role in supplying glucose for the body to use as energy. The gut microbiota, while not directly involved in the metabolism of glucose, regulates hormones that controls its levels. When a person consumes the recommended daily amount of sugar that allows the body to produce enough energy for normal function, the gut microbiome is considered in ‘eubiosis’, or healthy. However, when a person drastically redefines their diet to rely on artificial sweeteners, they are reducing the glucose they source from food, and rewiring their body's metabolic system to find other ways to make energy. Such changes have the potential to shift the balance of the gut microbiome to compensate. In addition to this, some artificial sweeteners remain unchanged through the gastrointestinal tract, and while large amounts are excreted in faeces and urine, studies have shown that these sweeteners have the potential to interact with the microbiome and select for an altered composition of bacteria, viruses, yeasts, and archaea. Studies described by Suez et al showed that such changes in gut microbial populations could then lead to increased fasting blood glucose levels, elevated haemoglobin A1c, altered metabolic hormone production, and glucose intolerance.

While sugar substitutes may seem like an appealing solution to reduce calorie intake and manage health concerns, it is crucial to understand their potential impact on gut health and metabolic processes. Although they have a lower caloric content than sugar, artificial sweeteners can disrupt the balance of gut microbiota, leading to unintended metabolic consequences. Therefore, it is important for individuals to carefully consider the long-term effects of these sweeteners on their health and not assume that all sugar-free alternatives are inherently beneficial. In the pursuit of better health, a balanced approach to sugar consumption and an awareness of how alternatives can affect the body are essential for making informed dietary choices.

References

1. Suez, J., Zmora, N., & Elinav, E. (2018). The gut microbiome and its implications for diet and health. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 15(8), 491-502. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-018-0032-4Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6176710/

2. Johns Hopkins Medicine. (n.d.). Facts about sugar and sugar substitutes. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-prevention/facts-about-sugar-and-sugar-substitutes

3. Mayo Clinic. (2021). Artificial sweeteners: Any health risk? Mayo Clinic. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/in-depth/artificial-sweeteners/art-20046936

4. Drexler, M. (1987, March 29). The bittersweet history of sugar substitutes. The New York Times Magazine. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from https://www.nytimes.com/1987/03/29/magazine/the-bittersweet-history-of-sugar-substitutes.html

5. Suez, J., Zmora, N., & Elinav, E. (2020). The role of the microbiome in regulating the effects of artificial sweeteners on metabolism. Cell Metabolism, 32(2), 216-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2020.06.005Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9029443/

6. Abate, T. (2022). The effects of artificial sweeteners on gut microbiota and metabolic regulation. Cureus, 14(10), e51299. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51299Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10822749/pdf/cureus-0015-00000051299.pdf

7. Lee, H., & Park, J. (2013). The impact of artificial sweeteners on the gut microbiota and metabolic health. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 24(6), 898-907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2012.10.003Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24251697/

Assessed and Endorsed by the MedReport Medical Review Board