Lecanemab: Targeting the Roots of Early Alzheimer’s Disease
- Fay

- 16 hours ago
- 2 min read

Introduction
For decades, the therapeutic landscape for Alzheimer's disease has been dominated by agents that temporarily alleviate symptoms without altering the underlying disease trajectory. The accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) is believed to initiate or potentiate the pathological processes of the disease. Lecanemab represents a significant shift in this paradigm as a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody designed to intervene in this pathological cascade.
Mechanism of Action
Unlike symptomatic treatments, lecanemab targets the disease pathology directly. It binds with high affinity to soluble Aβ protofibrils. Research suggests that these soluble protofibrils are more toxic to neurons than either amyloid monomers or insoluble fibrils. By targeting these specific aggregated species, the drug aims to facilitate their clearance from the brain.
The Clarity AD Trial: Design and Efficacy
The efficacy of lecanemab was evaluated in the "Clarity AD" trial, an 18-month, multicenter, double-blind, Phase 3 study. The trial enrolled 1,795 participants aged 50 to 90 years who were diagnosed with early Alzheimer’s disease (defined as mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia) and had confirmed evidence of amyloid pathology via PET scans or cerebrospinal fluid testing. Participants were randomized to receive intravenous lecanemab (10 mg per kilogram every two weeks) or a placebo.
The primary metric for success was the change in the Clinical Dementia Rating–Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score, a scale ranging from 0 to 18 where higher scores indicate greater impairment.
The results demonstrated a statistically significant slowing of clinical decline. At 18 months, the mean change in CDR-SB score was 1.21 for the lecanemab group compared to 1.66 for the placebo group. This difference of -0.45 points represents a reduction in clinical decline of approximately 27%. Furthermore, lecanemab showed significant benefits across key secondary endpoints, including the ADAS-cog14 (cognition) and ADCS-MCI-ADL (activities of daily living) scales.
Biological Impact and Safety Profile
Beyond clinical scores, lecanemab demonstrated profound effects on biological markers. In a substudy involving 698 participants, treatment resulted in a dramatic reduction in brain amyloid burden compared to placebo (a difference of -59.1 centiloids). By the end of the 18-month period, the mean amyloid level in the treatment group had dropped below the threshold typically used to define amyloid positivity.
However, this clearance comes with notable safety risks, primarily Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA). These abnormalities manifest as edema or effusions (ARIA-E) or as microhemorrhages and siderosis (ARIA-H).
In the Clarity AD trial, ARIA-E occurred in 12.6% of lecanemab-treated participants compared to 1.7% in the placebo group. Additionally, ARIA-H was observed in 17.3% of the treatment group versus 9.0% in the placebo group. While most ARIA-E events were mild to moderate and asymptomatic, serious adverse events and infusion-related reactions (26.4%) were recorded.
Conclusion
Lecanemab has demonstrated the ability to reduce markers of amyloid and result in a moderately less decline in cognition and function compared to placebo over 18 months. While these results mark a pivotal moment in Alzheimer's research, the association with adverse events like ARIA necessitates careful patient monitoring, and longer trials are currently underway to determine the drug's long-term safety and efficacy profile.
Sources
Assessed and Endorsed by the MedReport Medical Review Board






