top of page

Busting Myths About Epidural Anesthesia

Busting anesthesia myths.
Busting anesthesia myths.

When people hear “epidural”, there’s usually an opinion about it. In fact, when a patient refuses an epidural, the most common explanation I hear is: “I'm afraid of the complications”. But more often than not, that fear isn't rooted in clear information about what those complications actually are. Epidural anesthesia is a well-established technique used worldwide. It's versatile, effective, and — when used appropriately — a powerful tool for pain management. Let’s take a closer look at what epidural anesthesia really is and bust some common myths along the way.


What Is Epidural Anesthesia?

Epidural anesthesia is a method of neuraxial pain control. It works by injecting anesthetic medications into the epidural space of your spine, blocking sensory and motor nerve roots, that supply areas such as the thorax, abdomen, pelvis, and lower limbs [1]. In simple terms, it numbs specific parts of the body by interrupting nerve signals.


This technique is a powerful tool for managing moderate to severe surgical pain, but it doesn't stop there. It can also be used as a primary anesthetic during procedures or as a pain management adjuvant for chronic conditions and muscle spasticity [1].


One of the key benefits of epidurals is their flexibility. Clinicians can tailor the type of medication and how it's delivered — intermittently or continuously — to fit each patient's needs [2]. Even better? Epidurals often reduce the need for opioids during and after surgery, lowering the risk of side effects associated with those drugs [1].


Myth 1: Epidurals Are Only Used During Labor

While epidurals are common during childbirth, they are far from exclusive to pregnant women. This technique is frequently used in surgeries involving the chest, abdomen, or lower limbs. It’s often applied for pain relief but can also serve as the sole anesthetic during procedures.


That said, epidurals do offer unique advantages in pregnancy. They provide effective pain control with minimal side effects, allow for rapid conversion to anestesia in case of emergency C-section, and can help manage high blood pressure in patients with preeclampsia.


Myth 2: Epidurals Cause Chronic Back Pain

This is a common fear, but research shows that long-term back pain caused by epidurals is extremely rare [2]. It's normal to feel some temporary soreness at the injection site, but this usually fades in a few days.


Interestingly, many people who give birth report back pain afterward — regardless of whether they had an epidural. That’s because the bones and ligaments in the pelvis shift back to their pre-pregnancy positions, which can cause short-term discomfort [2].


Myth 3: Epidurals Have a High Risk of Nerve Damage

Let’s set the record straight: the incidence of neurologic complications after epidural anesthesia is approximately 1 in 25,000 [3]. This estimate includes3 minor complications that usually resolve on their own.


As for serious complications that require emergency surgery or cause lasting damage? Those are extremely rare [4].


So next time you hear someone mention epidural, you’ll know the facts. It’s not just for childbirth, it’s not associated with frequent neurological complications and it’s not a ticket to lifelong back pain. It’s a safe, adaptable tool that continues to help anesthesiologists manage pain across many different situations.


References:

[1] Hernandez ANA, Hendrix JM. Epidural anesthesia. StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. Published March 27, 2025. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542219/


[2] Professional CCM. Epidural. Cleveland Clinic. Published June 30, 2025. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/21896-epidural


[3] Moen V, Dahlgren N, Irestedt L. Severe Neurological Complications after Central Neuraxial Blockades in Sweden 1990–1999. Anesthesiology. 2004;101(4):950-959. doi:10.1097/00000542-200410000-00021


[4] Bos EME, Haumann J, De Quelerij M, et al. Haematoma and abscess after neuraxial anaesthesia: a review of 647 cases. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2018;120(4):693-704. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.105


Assessed and Endorsed by the MedReport Medical Review Board

 
 

©2025 by The MedReport Foundation, a Washington state non-profit organization operating under the UBI 605-019-306

 

​​The information provided by the MedReport Foundation is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The MedReport Foundation's resources are solely for informational, educational, and entertainment purposes. Always seek professional care from a licensed provider for any emergency or medical condition. 
 

bottom of page